Vertical Gender Segregation in Managerial Employment in Kazakhstan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejgs.v3i3.140Keywords:
Gender, Segregation, Leadership, Inequality, Employment, Career, Wage GapAbstract
Vertical gender segregation remains an important dimension of labour market inequality, reflecting differences in women's and men's representation across occupational hierarchies and access to managerial positions. This study assesses vertical gender segregation in managerial employment in Kazakhstan and identifies potential barriers to women’s career advancement. The empirical analysis draws on official statistics from the Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan on women's representation among managers in 2019–2024, data on the gender composition of the civil service as of January 1, 2025, and gender-disaggregated wage indicators for 2021–2025. The methodology combines descriptive statistical analysis, comparative assessment of gender representation, calculation of structural disparities, and synthesis of academic literature on career advancement. The findings indicate that women's representation among managers across all sectors declined from 43.0% in 2019 to 41.3% in 2024, despite a partial recovery after 2021. In the civil service, women accounted for 55.82% of total employment but only 39.10% of managerial positions, compared with 62.43% among non-managerial employees. These differences provide evidence of vertical gender segregation but do not independently establish the existence of a glass ceiling. The literature identifies professional specialisation, family responsibility, organisational practices, leadership evaluation, and access to career development opportunities as potential barriers that require further empirical investigation. The study contributes to understanding structural gender disparities in managerial employment and highlights the need for disaggregated longitudinal personnel data to assess inequalities in career progression and promotion.
Downloads
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organisations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
Baxter, J., & Wright, E. O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014002004
Bertrand, M. (2018). Coase lecture—The glass ceiling. Economica, 85(338), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12264
Bureau of National Statistics. (2025). Official statistical data. Retrieved August 25, 2026, from https://stat.gov.kz/en
Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–576. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0046
Gorman, E. H., & Kmec, J. A. (2009). Hierarchical rank and women’s organisational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5), 1428–1474. https://doi.org/10.1086/595950
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organisational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997507
Iskindirova, Z., Bekturganova, M., Tayshanova, S., & Sabitov, Z. (2026). Breaking the glass ceiling in Kazakhstani science: Government grants and gender representation trends. Knowledge and Performance Management, 10(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(1).2026.05
Kakabadse, N. K., Tatli, A., Nicolopoulou, K., Tankibayeva, A., & Mouraviev, N. (2018). A gender perspective on entrepreneurial leadership: Female leaders in Kazakhstan. European Management Review, 15(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12125
Kenzheali, Y., Kenzhegulova, G., Kireyeva, A., & Ainakul, N. (2024). Assessing gender differences in managerial roles, wages, education, and soft skills in Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.27
Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180010
Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2017). Female academic leadership in the post-Soviet context. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116682040
Kuzhabekova, A., Janenova, S., & Almukhambetova, A. (2018). Analysing the experiences of female leaders in civil service in Kazakhstan: Trapped between economic pressure to earn and traditional family role expectations. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(15), 1290–1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1387142
Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2021). Women’s progression through the leadership pipeline in the universities of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1599820
Lipovka, A. V., & Buzády, Z. (2024). Leadership and gender in Kazakhstan: An integrative literature review. Bulletin of Turan University, 3(103), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2024-1-3-35-98-112
Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777
Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.86
Ministry of Culture and Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2025). Kazakhstan on the path to gender equality: Women hold 39% of managerial positions in the civil service. https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/mam/press/news/details/952274?lang=ru [In Russian]
Prouska, R., Kozhakhmet, S., Sabytkhanova, M., & Wheeler, F. (2026). Job quality through the implementation of HR practices fostering well-being at work: Perspectives from women managers in Kazakhstan. Personnel Review, 55(4), 921–942. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2025-0143
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012
Yap, M., & Konrad, A. M. (2009). Gender and racial differentials in promotions: Is there a sticky floor, a mid-level bottleneck, or a glass ceiling? Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 64(4), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.7202/038875ar
Yeskerova, Z., Akybayeva, G., & Mambetova, S. (2025). Effectiveness of women’s leadership in public administration structures. Public Administration and Civil Service, 3(94), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2025-1497
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eurasian Journal of Gender Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.